top of page

Liquidity and Woodford

  • cawkwell2
  • Aug 6, 2025
  • 1 min read

Updated: Aug 8, 2025


Man years ago I read of a young stockbroker who was employed by Cazenove tried in 1931 to sell £15,000 worth of War Loan. He was so staggered by the total absence of a bid that he started crying. Or so it is recorded.


However, it reminds me of an extremely important point which is that there is no law and never will be any law obliging market makers or anybody else to bid for stock. I therefore have some sympathy with Neil Woodford whom the FCA proposes to fine £6m personally and whose management company is to get slammed for £40m.


Some will remark that Neil Woodford deliberately bought stock cheap and parlayed it up to an illiquid fund whose values could not in practice be challenged until, one day, they were. There is no evidence that such a breach of fiduciary duty occurred. (Quite why Kent county council decided to splosh £200m in such an investment is another matter - and, surely, some councillors have questions to answer here.)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
May your intuition carry you

Intuitive Investments (IIG) stands at 132p and, I am told, might go much higher - perhaps tenfold. Sir Nigel Rudd is chairman and he is no slouch at getting things done. The business is investments se

 
 
 
Lord Mandelson

When I declared that Mandelson had no reason to go to face a grilling by Congressmen I did not know that he had been selling confidential cabinet papers to Epstein. From here it looks certain that he

 
 
 
Lord Mandelson

I do not wish to be thought a perpetual defence entrant but as with AM-W Lord Mandelson is completely innocent. There is no evidence of improper conduct on his part. If Epstein elected to send him $7

 
 
 

Comments


Contact us

© 2025 Simon Cawkwell        Privacy policy     Terms

bottom of page