It was established over a year ago that Reeves lies any time she feels the urge - which is often. Why anyone believes a word of what she says I have no idea.
When I declared that Mandelson had no reason to go to face a grilling by Congressmen I did not know that he had been selling confidential cabinet papers to Epstein. From here it looks certain that he
I do not wish to be thought a perpetual defence entrant but as with AM-W Lord Mandelson is completely innocent. There is no evidence of improper conduct on his part. If Epstein elected to send him $7
Overnight there has been a further torrent of suggestions of illegal behaviour on the part of AM-W. All this is prurient nonsense. There is no evidence offered whatsoever. Further, were I a lawyer adv
Comments